. Some people think smoking should be banned because it can develop lung cancer. However, this is just one of the viewpoints. A spark neglected may burn the place beyond rescue and the smoker would then be guilty of a massacre! In this case the freedom to smoke in public area clashes with the individual right of those who don't want to be exposed to smoke. Public smoking should have definitely banned, not only smoking but also these gutkha, tambaakoo. Researchers find that smoking bans can reduce the number of heart attacks by as much as 26 percent per year.
Write at least 250 words. Smoking bans are common around the world and have been in place for years. Hence, allowing public smoking is really unethical as it is not putting just the health of smokers in risk but those of innocent non-smokers as well. In public places, I find myself walking by many designated smoking area all the time. To know more about this argument, learn about the pros and cons of smoking bans. Meyers adds that smoking remains the leading preventable risk factor for heart attack.
So, if employers want to increase work productivity and ensure that their employees remain healthy, they should ban smoking in and around office premises. Whether that decision was by personal choice is one thing but there are those that are placed in harms way by simply being exposed to the smoke. Thus, one of the major advantages of a ban is that it induces the notion to quit smoking. We have a right to clean air and to a safe environment, smoking should be banned in public places for man reasons, including the fact that it is a hug health risk for both smokers and non-smokers. It is currently responsible for the death of one in ten adults' worldwide about 5 million deaths each year.
Apart from heart diseases, other health hazards that are becoming increasingly common in both smokers and non-smokers are cancer and cirrhosis. For many smokers today it is getting hard to find a place to smoke. Of course, the second — hand smoke gets diluted by the time it reaches a non-smoker. Check out our poll and find out what is the dominant view among our users. However, legal restrictions on smoking have also raised concerns about. Smoking can come with huge health effects not only for the ones smoking, but those around them.
In a… 730 Words 3 Pages Smoking Should Not Be Banned in Restaurants In the perfect situation, smoking policy would be set by bar or restaurant owners, and customers would patronize the establishments with the policy they prefer. Because everyone in public health believes that what we do should be evidence-based. If people ban smoking in public spaces then it can even be harmful to the people who doesn't smoke. Since tobacco use is largely perceived to be a bad habit that squanders money and lives, should smoking be banned in public places? Cigarette smoke contains a staggering 4,000 different chemicals of which 43 are carcinogenic. Many prohibit smoking in all public places, including nightclubs and bars. Putting restrictions on public smoking may reduce the smoking level of some people. But over the years views got angrier and smarter, wanting regulations to be one with smoking.
They also argue it is a matter of freedom of choice. How, then, can smoking or rather puffing away smoke to create such a defiled environment be permitted in public places where your every little activity is likely to affect your neighbor? Do you support this ban or do you oppose it? I start coughing from the smell of smoke. It makes them feel more relaxed and at ease. But when I raised the issue of tobacco, they all became in a way, authoritarian. These outdoor proposals have fueled a lively debate between public health advocates and opponents who see such bans as an infringement on individual rights. Smoking any type of tobacco product is dangerous to the well-being of countless, not just the smoker, but individuals near the smoker. Smoking is not against the law, so individuals should have the freedom to smoke where they wish.
Forcing them to smoke in private or only in smokers designated areas is a way to stigmatize them in society. Nowadays, there are more and more people care about their health. And also by the use of the word 'they' to refer to the opponents. They may provoke fights and set a poor example for children. For example, when the smokers smoke in public places like restaurants, universities and other public places it hurts the non-smoker. Collectively, the studies involved 24 million people and observations of the effect of the bans ranged from two months to three years. Share: Public smoking bans appear to significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks, particularly among younger individuals and nonsmokers, according to a new study published in the September 29, 2009, issue of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
Many people television or internet has seen some kind of ad about how smoking is dangerous. My clothes smell, because they have been saturated with the smoke, it gets into my hair too. The baby was healthy before coming to her grandpa's house, but in less than two weeks, she volunteering. Cigarette smoking should be banned in public places because of the health risks it poses to people who are exposed to secondhand smoke. According to the pro-smoking group Air Initiative 7 in 10 of you do.
There is a delicate trade-off and it is not clear where the red lines should be placed. Smoking is legal and therefore, in no case a place can make it illegal or an offence. One was that smoking is dangerous to people around the smoker. Some people think smoking cigarettes are completely fine. In the feedback section you may notice other customers mentioning writer numbers. When his daughter visited him for a vacation, she brought her three year old daughter with her.
Over the period, the issue has become a bit sensitive and thus, calls for a proper evaluation of the pros and cons before imposing a ban. And, bam — a fire has begun. Smoking leads to several of the most dangerous disease. However, how many people agree this? He started smoking when he was 13 years old and he never imagined that 20 years later, smoking would take his life away, leaving his wife and child alone. It sets a bad example for who may internalize this habit as something normal and may become more prone to become smokers in the future.